State what a test case is and why evaluation requires more than a small number of examples.
Type Knowledge · introduced in version 0.1
Normative. These state what would be observed in a person who holds the statement.
Non-normative. Illustrative of evidence an awarding body might accept; not a required form.
Assumes
Statements a candidate is taken to hold already. Never at a higher level than this one.
This statement assumes no other statement. It is a starting point within its domain.
Assumed by
Derived inverse. Statements that take this one as given.
No published statement assumes this one at version 1.29.
Related
Cross-domain relationships, stated in both directions and typed in the content model.
State that an AI system may produce different output for the same input, and why that matters.
Referenced by
Entries on the register of conformance claims whose coverage map cites this statement.
Accredited awarding body — full credential portfolio assessed against the AI Competence Framework · Tier III
| Introduced | Version 0.1 |
|---|---|
| Last modified | Not modified since introduction |
| Status | active · stable |
| Version displayed | v1.29 |
| Permanent URL | aicertificationstandards.org/framework/statements/D6.L1.03 |
AI Certification Standards (2026) AICF D6.L1.03, D6 Evaluation and assurance, version 1.29. Available at aicertificationstandards.org/framework/v1.29/statements/D6.L1.03 (accessed date).
Statements change through the published process, not by correspondence
An amendment to this statement, its indicators or its relationships is proposed through the contribution process. Every submission is answered on the record, and the reasoning for acceptance or rejection is published in the release record for the version that follows.
Propose an amendment to D6.L1.03Writing rules and the controlled verb list that govern how this statement is worded are published in the methodology.
This page displays version 1.29 · last reviewed 30.08.2026