SETTING GLOBAL STANDARDS FOR TRUSTED AI CREDENTIALSAI Competence Framework v1.29 · current release

Governance

AI Certification Standards is a nonprofit standards body. Its purpose is to publish and maintain the AI Competence Framework as a public reference.

The organisation awards no credentials, delivers no training and assesses no candidates. Who founded it, how it is funded and what its directors declare are set out in full at Who we are, and what we disclose. We publish that because a standards body whose independence rests on the reader not asking is not independent.

Last reviewed 30.08.2026 · next scheduled review annually

Contents

What this section contains

Six pages. Each states a position and shows the record that evidences it.

PageContains
Who we are, and what we discloseFounding history, related parties, and what those relationships mean
The boardMembers, affiliations, terms, appointment and removal
Conflict of interest policyDeclaration, recusal, and the published record of recusals
FundingEvery source, amount and condition
How decisions are madeWho decides framework changes, and by what process
DocumentsConstitution, articles, policies, minutes
Governing commitments

Six commitments, each with the record that evidences it

These are claims that can be checked. Every one links to the page where the evidence is published.

Commitment 01

The framework is published in full and free to use.

No part is withheld, gated or reserved for paying parties.

Evidence · Licence
Commitment 02

The organisation issues no credentials and assesses no individuals.

It publishes a specification. Awarding is done by others, independently.

Evidence · Framework scope
Commitment 03

Every funding source is published with its amount and conditions.

Including where the funder is a related party.

Evidence · Funding
Commitment 04

Every director's outside interests are published.

Including interests with no bearing on this organisation's work.

Evidence · The board
Commitment 05

Where a decision involves a related party, conflicted directors are recused and the recusal is published as a dated record.

Recusal means leaving the discussion, not abstaining from the vote.

Evidence · Notices
Commitment 06

Framework changes follow a published process with public consultation.

Rejected proposals are published with the reason they were rejected.

Evidence · Decisions

Page last reviewed 30.08.2026