Design fitness criteria for an AI system before development, derived from its intended use.
Type Skill · introduced in version 0.1
Normative. These state what would be observed in a person who holds the statement.
Non-normative. Illustrative of evidence an awarding body might accept; not a required form.
Assumes
Statements a candidate is taken to hold already. Never at a higher level than this one.
Apply defined acceptance criteria to judge whether an AI output meets a stated requirement.
Assumed by
Derived inverse. Statements that take this one as given.
Establish the acceptance criteria a solution must meet before release.
Related
Cross-domain relationships, stated in both directions and typed in the content model.
Decide whether to build, buy, adapt or decline.
Design the architecture of an AI-enabled solution, stating its boundaries.
Specify the human role in a system before specifying its automation.
Assess total cost of ownership, including evaluation, monitoring and change.
Design for failure, degradation and unavailability.
Establish the acceptance criteria a solution must meet before release.
Assess the effect of a solution on the people who do the work.
Advise on a proposal that should not proceed, and state why.
Design fairness requirements for a system and the evidence they require.
Construct assessment tasks that produce evidence an assessor can judge.
Referenced by
Entries on the register of conformance claims whose coverage map cites this statement.
No entry on the register cites this statement. This block is populated from the coverage maps of register entries as they are listed.
| Introduced | Version 0.1 |
|---|---|
| Last modified | Not modified since introduction |
| Status | active · stable |
| Version displayed | v1.29 |
| Permanent URL | aicertificationstandards.org/framework/statements/D6.L3.01 |
AI Certification Standards (2026) AICF D6.L3.01, D6 Evaluation and assurance, version 1.29. Available at aicertificationstandards.org/framework/v1.29/statements/D6.L3.01 (accessed date).
Statements change through the published process, not by correspondence
An amendment to this statement, its indicators or its relationships is proposed through the contribution process. Every submission is answered on the record, and the reasoning for acceptance or rejection is published in the release record for the version that follows.
Propose an amendment to D6.L3.01Writing rules and the controlled verb list that govern how this statement is worded are published in the methodology.
This page displays version 1.29 · last reviewed 30.08.2026