O1PUBLISHED

Instruction and assessment

Statements for those who teach AI competence or assess it in others: designing instruction against defined statements, and judging evidence of competence rather than evidence of familiarity.

11 statements published at v1.29

What this overlay covers

INDesigning instruction against named statements at a named level, rather than against topics.

INSelecting and constructing assessment tasks that produce evidence an assessor can judge.

INJudging evidence against performance indicators, including borderline and insufficient evidence.

INRecognising and declaring the limits of one’s own competence in the domains being taught.

INHandling conflict of interest where the instructor is also the assessor.

OUTThe subject competence itself. An instructor teaching D6 at L3 must hold the D6 statements; the overlay does not restate them.

OUTAwarding-body procedure, quality assurance and appeals, which belong to the awarding body and not to a person’s competence.

OUTGeneral pedagogy unrelated to AI competence.

How it combines with core statements

An instruction credential is assembled from core domain statements at the level the instructor must themselves hold, plus O1 statements covering the obligations of instructing and assessing. The core statements say what the person knows; the overlay says what they owe to the people they teach.

Assembly shape

Core	Domain statements at the level the practitioner must hold themselves
Overlay	O1 statements covering the obligations of this function

An overlay adds statements. It never modifies or replaces a core statement.

Statements by level

Every identifier is a permanent address. Indicators are normative; they state what would be observed in a person who meets the statement.

L2 Applied

3 statements

O1.L2.01Practice

Deliver instruction against named statements at a named level.

Indicators

States the statements a session addresses before delivering it

Keeps delivery within the level claimed

Reports where the material does not reach the statements it claims

O1.L2.02Skill

Collect evidence of a learner’s performance against stated indicators.

Indicators

Collects evidence against each indicator rather than an overall impression

Records what was observed, not what was inferred

Identifies where evidence is insufficient rather than filling the gap

O1.L2.03Skill

Give feedback that names the indicator not yet met and what would meet it.

Indicators

Names the specific indicator and the gap

States what evidence would satisfy it

Separates feedback on evidence from judgement of the person

L3 Proficient

5 statements

O1.L3.01Skill

Design instruction from a set of statements and a target level.

Indicators

Derives objectives from statements rather than from topics

States which statements are taught and which are assumed

Provides for a learner who does not hold the assumed statements

O1.L3.02Skill

Construct assessment tasks that produce evidence an assessor can judge.

Indicators

Designs tasks whose output maps to named indicators

Avoids tasks answerable from familiarity rather than competence

States the conditions under which the task is valid

O1.L3.03Judgement

Judge borderline and insufficient evidence consistently.

Indicators

Applies the indicator rather than a global impression

Records the reason for a borderline decision

Refers rather than resolving a case the criteria do not cover

O1.L3.04Skill

Establish and monitor agreement between assessors.

Indicators

Measures agreement rather than assuming it

Distinguishes ambiguous criteria from inconsistent application

Revises guidance in response to identified causes

O1.L3.05Practice

Declare and manage the limits of one’s own competence in the domains taught.

Indicators

States the statements and levels one is competent to teach and assess

Declines or refers work beyond them

Reviews the declaration as the framework changes

L4 Advanced

3 statements

O1.L4.01Practice

Establish the standard for instruction and assessment across a provider.

Indicators

Defines the minimum evidence required for a judgement of competence

Sets requirements for assessor competence and monitoring

Establishes how the standard is itself verified

O1.L4.02Judgement

Govern conflict of interest where instruction and assessment are held together.

Indicators

States when the instructor may not be the assessor

Provides an independent route for contested judgements

Records and publishes the arrangement

O1.L4.03Practice

Account for the validity of claims a provider makes about coverage and level.

Indicators

Verifies coverage claims against delivered material

Withdraws or corrects a claim that is not supported

Holds named individuals accountable for the claim

Relationship to domains

D1–D8	The instructor holds the core statements they teach, at or above the level taught.
D6	Assessment of AI competence is itself an evaluation activity; D6 evaluation statements underpin judging evidence.
O2	Organisational capability building overlaps where instruction is delivered internally rather than as a credential.

All three

Overlays

Eight areas

Domains

Filtered view

Statements in O1

This page displays version 1.29 · release record: /framework/v1.29