SETTING GLOBAL STANDARDS FOR TRUSTED AI CREDENTIALSAI Competence Framework v1.29 · current release
AI Certification Standards
Apply for conformance
You are reading the current version of the framework, v1.29.Permanent address for this version
D6.L2.06ACTIVESTABLED6 Evaluation and assurance · L2 Applied

Report evaluation findings, distinguishing measured results from impressions.

Type Skill · introduced in version 0.1

Performance indicators

Normative. These state what would be observed in a person who holds the statement.

Separates what was measured from what was inferred
States the size and composition of the evaluation set
States the limitations of the evaluation performed
Evidence examples

Non-normative. Illustrative of evidence an awarding body might accept; not a required form.

A worked artefact produced in the course of normal duties, with the reasoning recorded at the time
Attestation by a competent supervisor against the indicators above, not against a general impression
Relationships

Assumes

Statements a candidate is taken to hold already. Never at a higher level than this one.

This statement assumes no other statement. It is a starting point within its domain.

Assumed by

Derived inverse. Statements that take this one as given.

No published statement assumes this one at version 1.29.

Related

Cross-domain relationships, stated in both directions and typed in the content model.

D7.L2.01

Disclose AI involvement in work where disclosure is required.

D7.L2.02

Apply organisational and legal obligations to a specific AI task.

D7.L2.03

Check AI-assisted work for effects that fall unevenly on a group of people.

D7.L2.04

Attribute and respect the rights in material used and produced.

D7.L2.05

Raise a concern about an AI use they believe to be wrong.

D7.L2.06

Explain to an affected person, accurately, how AI was involved in a decision.

O3.L3.05

Report assurance conclusions, including unwelcome ones, with their basis.

Referenced by

Entries on the register of conformance claims whose coverage map cites this statement.

IBAIC Inc.

Accredited awarding body — full credential portfolio assessed against the AI Competence Framework · Tier III

Provenance
IntroducedVersion 0.1
Last modifiedNot modified since introduction
Statusactive · stable
Version displayedv1.29
Permanent URLaicertificationstandards.org/framework/statements/D6.L2.06
Cite this statement

AI Certification Standards (2026) AICF D6.L2.06, D6 Evaluation and assurance, version 1.29. Available at aicertificationstandards.org/framework/v1.29/statements/D6.L2.06 (accessed date).

Propose an amendment

Statements change through the published process, not by correspondence

An amendment to this statement, its indicators or its relationships is proposed through the contribution process. Every submission is answered on the record, and the reasoning for acceptance or rejection is published in the release record for the version that follows.

Propose an amendment to D6.L2.06

Writing rules and the controlled verb list that govern how this statement is worded are published in the methodology.

This page displays version 1.29 · last reviewed 30.08.2026