Explain to an affected person, accurately, how AI was involved in a decision.
Type Skill · introduced in version 1.29
Normative. These state what would be observed in a person who holds the statement.
Non-normative. Illustrative of evidence an awarding body might accept; not a required form.
Assumes
Statements a candidate is taken to hold already. Never at a higher level than this one.
This statement assumes no other statement. It is a starting point within its domain.
Assumed by
Derived inverse. Statements that take this one as given.
No published statement assumes this one at version 1.29.
Related
Cross-domain relationships, stated in both directions and typed in the content model.
Write an instruction stating task, context, format and constraints.
Supply the material a system needs rather than relying on its recall.
Revise an instruction in response to a specific defect in the output.
Use examples to establish the required form of an output.
Recognise and interrupt an unproductive exchange rather than continuing it.
Record an instruction that worked so that it can be reused and reviewed.
Establish the licence and permitted use of material supplied to or produced by a system.
Identify the constraints a solution must work within.
Report evaluation findings, distinguishing measured results from impressions.
Referenced by
Entries on the register of conformance claims whose coverage map cites this statement.
No entry on the register cites this statement. This block is populated from the coverage maps of register entries as they are listed.
| Introduced | Version 1.29 |
|---|---|
| Last modified | Not modified since introduction |
| Status | active · stable |
| Version displayed | v1.29 |
| Permanent URL | aicertificationstandards.org/framework/statements/D7.L2.06 |
AI Certification Standards (2026) AICF D7.L2.06, D7 Ethics, governance and professional practice, version 1.29. Available at aicertificationstandards.org/framework/v1.29/statements/D7.L2.06 (accessed date).
Statements change through the published process, not by correspondence
An amendment to this statement, its indicators or its relationships is proposed through the contribution process. Every submission is answered on the record, and the reasoning for acceptance or rejection is published in the release record for the version that follows.
Propose an amendment to D7.L2.06Writing rules and the controlled verb list that govern how this statement is worded are published in the methodology.
This page displays version 1.29 · last reviewed 30.08.2026