This page shows the form of a register entry so that it can be reviewed before any claim exists. The organisation named here is fictional, no claim has been made or decided, and this record is excluded from every count on the register.
Example Awarding Body Ltd
Certificate in AI Output Evaluation
Tier II · framework v0.1 · listed 29.08.2026 · last reviewed 29.08.2026
| Organisation | Example Awarding Body Ltd |
|---|---|
| Claim | Certificate in AI Output Evaluation |
| Claim kind | credential |
| Tier | TIER II — Verified credential |
| Framework version | v0.1, pinned |
| Extensions | None referenced |
| Date listed | 29.08.2026 |
| Last reviewed | 29.08.2026 |
| Status | listed |
| Permanent address | aicertificationstandards.org/register/specimen |
That the coverage map is accurate and that the assessment instruments, pass mark and standard-setting record were examined and found sufficient for the level claimed.
Nothing about other credentials from the same provider, and nothing about delivery quality after the review date.
Certificate in AI Output Evaluation · L2, Applied
Every statement identifier below links to the statement it names, at the framework version this claim was made against. A register that lists organisations without showing what they claim is a directory.
| Statement | Coverage | Weighting | Assessment method |
|---|---|---|---|
| D6.L1.01 | TAUGHT | — | Prerequisite framing, module 1 |
| D6.L1.03 | TAUGHT | — | Prerequisite framing, module 1 |
| D6.L2.01 | BOTH | 20 | Practical: evaluate three supplied outputs against a stated purpose |
| D6.L2.02 | BOTH | 20 | Practical: as above, with a written justification |
| D6.L2.03 | BOTH | 15 | Written short-answer, four items drawn from the indicators |
| D6.L2.04 | ASSESSED | 15 | Written short-answer, four items drawn from the indicators |
| D6.L2.05 | BOTH | 20 | Portfolio: one evaluation record from the learner’s own work |
| D6.L2.06 | BOTH | 10 | Portfolio: reporting section |
Not referenced. The credential claims L2 and treats L1 as assumed, which the assumes relationships support.
12.08.2026 · coverage map v1.0 · A. Named Person, Head of Assessment
Who decided this, when, and who stood out
| Reference | CD-SPECIMEN |
|---|---|
| Decided by | Office of the Registrar |
| Date | 29.08.2026 |
| Recusal | None recorded on this specimen. Where a decision concerns a related party, the recusal is published as a notice and linked from here. |
Every status change this entry has had
Nothing is removed from this history. A withdrawal or lapse is added to it, and the entry stays on the register marked.
Anyone may challenge an entry on this register
Write to the Office of the Registrar quoting the entry reference CH-SPECIMEN and stating what in the claim you believe to be inaccurate, with the evidence for it. The holder is told what was alleged and on what evidence, though not necessarily by whom.
The outcome is published as a notice whether or not the challenge succeeds, and the entry's history records it. A challenge that we reject is published with the reason.
AI Certification Standards (2026) Register of conformance claims: Example Awarding Body Ltd, TIER II, framework version 0.1. Available at aicertificationstandards.org/register/specimen (accessed date).
Page last reviewed 30.08.2026 · back to the register